> It was unclear to me if ultimately תוספות holds that a סומא is or is NOT מחויב in מצוות לא תעשה. And if so, מדרבנן or מדאורייתא ?
> In your discussion of the בית יוסף questions of תוספות, you indicated that the ר''ן answered that the concern of ברכה שאינה צריכה is "only דרבנן." So what: is that not still a problem with making the ברכה?
> When you were discussing the reference of a woman handling a לולב on שבת, you quoted an explanation that the case was one of a woman who did NOT want to do the מצווה, so the לולב would be מוקצה for her, which would preclude her being able…
_edited_edited_edited_edited.png)
I apologize to all that listened last week. There was an error in the recording, had a portion repeated and missing the end. It is now corrected.
Thank you, Reuven.
> It was unclear to me if ultimately תוספות holds that a סומא is or is NOT מחויב in מצוות לא תעשה. And if so, מדרבנן or מדאורייתא ?
> In your discussion of the בית יוסף questions of תוספות, you indicated that the ר''ן answered that the concern of ברכה שאינה צריכה is "only דרבנן." So what: is that not still a problem with making the ברכה?
> When you were discussing the reference of a woman handling a לולב on שבת, you quoted an explanation that the case was one of a woman who did NOT want to do the מצווה, so the לולב would be מוקצה for her, which would preclude her being able…